Skip to main content

Difference Between ASP.NET WebForms and ASP.NET MVC




One of the frequently asked questions about ASP.NET MVC is that how is different from ASP.NET WebForms. Is ASP.NET MVC a replacement for WebForms.

The answer is No. ASP.NET MVC, is not a replacement for WebForms. Both ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET WebForms are built on top of the Core ASP.NET Framework. In fact a lot of features we use in ASP.NET such as Roles, Membership, Authentication and a lot of namespaces, classes and interfaces can be used in an ASP.NET MVC application

ASP.NET WebForms
ASP.NET MVC
Uses the ‘Page Controller’ pattern. Each page has a code-behind class that acts as a controller and is responsible for rendering the layout.Uses the ‘Front Controller’ pattern. There is a single central controller for all pages to process web application requests and facilitates a rich routing architecture
Uses an architecture that combines the Controller (code behind) and the View (.aspx). Thus the Controller has a dependency on the View. Due to this, testing and maintainability becomes an issue.ASP.NET MVC enforces a "separation of concerns". The Model does not know anything about the View. The View does not know there’s a Controller. This makes MVC applications easier to test and maintain
The View is called before the Controller.Controller renders View based on actions as a result of the User Interactions on the UI.
At its core, you ‘cannot’ test your controller without instantiating a View. There are ways to get around it using tools.At its core, ASP.NET MVC was designed to make test-driven development easier. You ‘can’ test your Controller without instantiating a View and carry out unit-tests without having to run the controllers in an ASP.NET process.
WebForms manage state by using view state and server-based controls.ASP.NET MVC does not maintain state information by using view state
WebForms supports an event-driven programming style that is like Windows applications and is abstracted from the user. The State management is made transparent by using sessions, viewstate etc. In the process, the HTML output is not clean making it difficult to manage later. The ViewState also increases your page size.In ASP.NET MVC, the output is clean and you have full control over the rendered HTML. The orientation is towards building standard compliant pages and provides full control over the behavior of an application.
Deep understanding of HTML, CSS and JavaScript is not required to a large extent since the WebForm model abstracts a lot of these details and provides automatic plumbing. While abstracting details to provide ease of use, sometimes a solution is overcomplicated, than it needs to be.A thorough understanding of how HTML, CSS and JavaScript work together is required. The advantage is you can do a lot of jQuery and AJAX stuff in an efficient and simple manner than you would do in an ASP.NET application.
WebForms can drastically reduce time while building up intranet and internet applications that use a lot of controls (drag and drop model). Although this is true for development, a lot of time is spent later to code around limitations.You lose the 'drag and drop' quick model of building your web applications. The focus is on control over the application behavior and test-driven development. The model is extensible and you do not have to spend time working around limitations.
Relatively simple to learn and pickup. Works very well for developers who initially have trouble with the HTTP/HTML model and are coming from a similar WinForms oriented event model.There is a learning curve to understand the why, when and how of ASP.NET MVC.
Lesser amount of code is required to build webapps since a lot of components are integrated and provided out of the box. You can also use a lot of data controls provided out of the box that rely on ViewState.Since the application tasks are separated into different components, amount of code required is more. Since ASP.NET MVC does not use ViewState, you cannot use Data controls like GridView, Repeater.
Works very well for small teams where focus is on rapid application developmentWorks well for large projects where focus in on testability and maintainability

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Asp.Net AjaxFileUpload Control With Drag Drop And Progress Bar

This Example explains how to use AjaxFileUpload Control With Drag Drop And Progress Bar Functionality In Asp.Net 2.0 3.5 4.0 C# And VB.NET. Previous Post  I was Explained about the   jQuery - Allow Alphanumeric (Alphabets & Numbers) Characters in Textbox using JavaScript  ,  Fileupload show selected file in label when file selected  ,  Check for file size with JavaScript before uploading  . May 2012 release of AjaxControlToolkit includes a new AjaxFileUpload Control  which supports Multiple File Upload, Progress Bar and Drag And Drop functionality. These new features are supported by Google Chrome version 16+, Firefox 8+ , Safari 5+ and Internet explorer 10 + , IE9 or earlier does not support this feature. To start with it, download and put latest AjaxControlToolkit.dll in Bin folder of application, Place ToolkitScriptManager  and AjaxFileUpload on the page. HTML SOURCE < asp:ToolkitScriptManager I...

View online files using the Google Docs Viewer

Use Google Docs Viewer for Document viewing within Browser I was looking for a way to let users see Microsoft Word Doc or PDF files online while using my application without leaving their browser without downloading files and then opening it to view with Word or PDF viewer . I was looking for some way out either via any PHP or Microsoft.NET libraries, did some googling on that; but later on I just got an idea that google already has all code written for me.. when I have any email attachment in PDF or DOC or DOCX google does it for me ..! Even while searching I can see PDFs by converting them in HTML. So I just googled it up and found that Google already has this ability that we can use Google Docs Viewer without any Google Account Login . YES that's true no Google Account login is required. It's damn simple and easy. Just pass document path as attachment as parameter and we are done. Google Docs Viewer gives us ability to embed PDF, DOC/DOCX, PPT, TIFF:...

How to send mail asynchronously in asp.net with MailMessage

With Microsoft.NET Framework 2.0 everything is asynchronous and we can send mail also asynchronously. This features is very useful when you send lots of bulk mails like offers , Discounts , Greetings . You don’t have to wait for response from mail server and you can do other task . By using     SmtpClient . SendAsync Method (MailMessage, Object)    you need to do  System.Net.Mail has also added asynchronous support for sending email. To send asynchronously, you need need to Wire up a SendCompleted event Create the SendCompleted event Call SmtpClient.SendAsync smtpClient.send() will initiate the sending on the main/ui  thread and would block.  smtpClient.SendAsync() will pick a thread from the .NET Thread Pool and execute the method on that thread. So your main UI will not hang or block . Let's create a simple example to send mail. For sending mail asynchronously you need to create a event handler that will notify that mail success...